- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:51:18 -0700
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
No, part of my head was still thinking in terms of "header," ignoring the part that agreed with #1 ;) There was a draft describing a header at one point, but IIRC it was never submitted, and is irrelevant now. Sorry, my mistake. On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 11:46 AM, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > Hmm, I was referring to the media type draft - I know this may sound > silly but do we have other drafts not linked from [2]? > > Henrik > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/#drafts > >>> 3) The spec editors should add a note to the spec that we know that >>> this is an ID with no standing. >> >> FYI, [1] is winding its way through the process; if it becomes >> standard, >> the I-D will not become necessary (W3C will be able to >> directly request >> the header registration from IANA, IIRC). It's probably still >> a safe bet >> to maintain the draft for the time being, though. >> -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 14:51:21 UTC