Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle from Martin Gudgin on 2002-04-23 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from April 2002)

From: Martin Gudgin <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 20:17:37 +0100
To: "Ray Whitmer" <rayw@netscape.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004901c1eafb$885fb8b0$b47ba8c0@zerogravitas>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Whitmer" <rayw@netscape.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle


<SNIP/>
> Actually, some places you need to know a namespace binding are clear,
> and others are not.  I am not sure that it is ever clear that you need
> xml:base.  Especially not at the raw infoset level.

Actually the infoset carries a base URI property for Document, Element and
Processing Instruction Information Items. So xml:base would modify the
infoset.

Gudge

<SNIP/>

Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 15:17:14 UTC