Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Locally vs. Globally Scoped from Jacek Kopecky on 2002-04-17 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from April 2002)

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:28:01 +0200 (CEST)
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204172219570.28807-100000@mail.idoox.com>

 The issue about us keeping the distinction between locally and
globally scoped labels has also been commented on by me in [1]
and Martin Gudgin replied in [2]:
 "We do use the distinction in 3.1.3. I guess we Could just say
the label is a QName, end of story."

 Let me propose that we go exactly this path - just making a 
label a qname, and removing the appropriate part of section 3.1.3 
which won't be needed then. I'd leave the appropriate changes to 
the editors.

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0137.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0198.html

Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 16:28:03 UTC