- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:08:20 -0400
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>, "John Ibbotson" <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>, moreau@crf.canon.fr, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
I can live with "request-response". Actually, one of the hidden assumptions in our use of this is that it is a reasonably rapid request/response. If I'm placing an order and expecting a response in 3 months, this isnt' the one to use (or certainly the HTTP binding won't be happy.) So, I'm a bit tempted to suggest something along the lines of "rapid-request-response", "request-with-immediate-response", or some such. One day, we'll need a different pattern (or features to distinguish), long running from short running, IMO. Again, I can live with "request-response". ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com> Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 04/22/2002 01:25 PM To: "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com> cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "John Ibbotson" <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>, <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Martin Gudgin" <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>, (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: RE: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP I think that's fine Henrik >request-response would work for me. > >Williams, Stuart wrote: > >>>what's wrong with simple-request-response
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 20:26:54 UTC