- From: Joop Stringer <joop.stringer@cgey.nl>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 02:40:19 -0400 (EDT)
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
- Message-ID: <scb69cfa.045@cgey.nl>
Dear All, We're in a political discussion wether a SOAP body element SHOULD have a namespace URI and Local name. Refering to the W3c documentation ( http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383503 ) it states that "All immediate child elements of the Body element are called body entries and each body entry is encoded as an independent element within the SOAP Body element." The first sentence in point 1 states : A body entry is identified by its fully qualified element name, which consists of the namespace URI and the local name. The second sentence in point 1 states: Immediate child elements of the SOAP Body element MAY be namespace-qualified. Correct me if I'm wrong: "a body entrie is an immediate child element of the BODY element and MAY be namespace-qualified" Hope you can help us out of this very important discussion. Best Regards, Joop Stringer Mobile Technology Lab Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Euclideslaan 2 3584BN UTRECHT, NL +31-30-6897777 +31-615-030233 joop.stringer@cgey.nl http://motel.capgemini.nl -- **************************************************************************** This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. ****************************************************************************
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: TEXT.htm
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 08:23:47 UTC