Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding

+1

Marc Hadley wrote:

> As I stated earlier, this would mean that every implementation that
> supports attachments (i.e. nearly all of them) could not be said to
> conform to our HTTP binding. We would be defining a set of conformance
> criteria that hardly anyone would be interested in conforming with !

Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 10:59:18 UTC