- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 14:45:10 +0200
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
- CC: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Suggested issues, raised by Noah. Jean-Jacques. Issue1 ------ * Section 5.4.2: Should we allow xml:lang on faultString? This will probably be a concern for the internationalization folks. Issue2 ------- * Section 5.4.1: the third bullet indicates that a fault code element may have one or two child element information items. The first is a mandatory value, the second is an optional subcode. Question: do we require these to occur in order? The current specification does not say, and therefore implies that order is insignificant. The same question arises later in this section in the discussion of subcode.
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 07:47:16 UTC