w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2003 by author

Aaron Swartz

• new media type I-D (Friday, 14 February)

Brian McBride

• Re: RDF Containers and OWL Lite (Thursday, 27 February)
• issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Draft Abstract Semantic Web Architecture (Thursday, 27 February)
• Draft Abstract Semantic Web Architecture (Thursday, 27 February)
• Draft Project Review Abstract for Intro (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March (Thursday, 27 February)
• call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (Wednesday, 26 February)
• completing review of lcc comments (Wednesday, 26 February)
• attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes (Wednesday, 26 February)
• last call comments period ends, but ... (Monday, 24 February)
• Fwd: XQuery and XPath Full-Text Requirements and Use Cases WDs published (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Informal RDF/HTML 2003-02-21 teleconference cancelled (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: handling lc comments schedule (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: subject/predicate/object terminology (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Thursday, 13 February)
• responding to comments (Thursday, 13 February)
• call for agenda items (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call (Thursday, 13 February)
• Tech Plenary Meeting (Thursday, 13 February)
• handling lc comments schedule (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Fwd: 2003 Tech Plenary Agenda Now Available (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-05 (Friday, 7 February)
• call for agenda items (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: LC document issue [was Re: review of primer - thumbs up] (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Summary of Last Call Process (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Last Call Comments Process (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Monday, 3 February)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-28 (Friday, 28 February)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-14 (Thursday, 13 February)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-07 (Friday, 7 February)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March (Friday, 28 February)
• analysis of RDFS use of term 'namespace' (Friday, 28 February)
• RDFS LC todo doc (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-07 (Friday, 7 February)
• reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call (Friday, 7 February)
• (fwd) ICS-FORTH Validating RDF Parser (VRP) v2.5 (Tuesday, 4 February)

Dan Connolly

• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: rdfs:member for Collections and collection syntax? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Informal RDF/HTML 2003-02-21 teleconference cancelled (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Informal RDF/HTML 2003-02-21 teleconference cancelled (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Agenda (lc process) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Monday, 3 February)

Dave Beckett

• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: designating datatypes (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Requirements for schema component designators (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call (Thursday, 13 February)

Eric Miller

• Informal RDF/HTML 2003-02-21 teleconference cancelled (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Tech Plenary Meeting (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Tech Plenary Meeting (Thursday, 13 February)
• [Fwd: [Moderator Action] RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling] (Tuesday, 4 February)

Frank Manola

• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: completing review of lcc comments (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: subject/predicate/object terminology (Friday, 14 February)
• subject/predicate/object terminology (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-07 (Friday, 7 February)
• LC document issue [was Re: review of primer - thumbs up] (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: response to semantics comment pfps-01 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Last Call Comments Process (Tuesday, 4 February)

Graham Klyne

• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) (Friday, 28 February)
• Personal URI of summary of LC comments on Concepts (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [schema] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals (Tuesday, 25 February)
• [schema] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents (Friday, 21 February)
• [collections] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: handling lc comments schedule (Tuesday, 18 February)
• What is scope of "RDF Core"? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: handling lc comments schedule (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-14 (Monday, 17 February)
• Possible regrets for telecon 2003-02-14 (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to semantics comment pfps-01 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Comments on (informal) meaning of lists (Tuesday, 4 February)

Jan Grant

• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Monday, 24 February)
• Last rundown of the -comments list coming tomorrow (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: FW: Comments on RDF last call working drafts (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Telecon minutes 2003-02-14 (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Agenda (lc process) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Minutes for telecon 2003-02-07 (Monday, 10 February)
• Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-05 (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Summary of Last Call Process (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Tuesday, 4 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: RDF Containers and OWL Lite (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes (Thursday, 27 February)
• RDF Containers and OWL Lite (Thursday, 27 February)
• Social meaning discussion 6th March (Wednesday, 26 February)
• RE: designating datatypes (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Monday, 24 February)
• reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: [collections] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Monday, 17 February)
• Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Thursday, 13 February)
• Regrets Fri 14 (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Monday, 3 February)

Jos De_Roo

• regrets for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-28 (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Tech Plenary Meeting (Thursday, 13 February)
• belated regrets for the 2003-02-07 telecon (Friday, 7 February)

Joseph Reagle

• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Monday, 3 February)

Mary Holstege

• Requirements for schema component designators (Friday, 7 February)

Massimo Marchiori

• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)

Mike Dean

• Re: Minutes for telecon 2003-02-07 (Monday, 10 February)

pat hayes

• RE: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Tuesday, 25 February)
• editors draft of Semantics. (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: designating datatypes (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: designating datatypes (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: designating datatypes (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: designating datatypes (Monday, 24 February)
• Fwd: Re: DAML Principal Investigators Meeting - Official Announcement (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: rdfs:member for Collections and collection syntax? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Friday, 21 February)
• [schema] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals (Friday, 21 February)
• designating datatypes (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: subject/predicate/object terminology (Friday, 21 February)
• Words of wisdom from Shelley (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• what was that again? (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Fwd: XMLLiteral (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [Fwd: [Moderator Action] RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling] (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: error in Semantics document (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• link and definition needed (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to comment pfps-04 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• response to issue pfps-09 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• response to issue pfps-10 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Comments on (informal) meaning of lists (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Last Call Comments Process (Tuesday, 4 February)
• response to issue pfps-8 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• response to issue pfps-07 (Monday, 3 February)
• response to issue pfps-06 (Monday, 3 February)
• response to comment pfps-05 (Monday, 3 February)
• response to comment pfps-04 (Monday, 3 February)
• response to pfps-03 (Monday, 3 February)
• response to comment pfps-02 (Monday, 3 February)
• response to semantics comment pfps-01 (Monday, 3 February)
• semantics comments (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Monday, 3 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Last Call Comments Process (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Monday, 3 February)
• changes to RDFS MT post-last-call (Tuesday, 28 January)

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-28 (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Wednesday, 26 February)
• RE: designating datatypes (Wednesday, 26 February)
• RE: designating datatypes (Wednesday, 26 February)
• RE: designating datatypes (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: designating datatypes (Monday, 24 February)
• FW: Comments on RDF last call working drafts (Wednesday, 19 February)
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Tuesday, 18 February)
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Regrets for this Friday (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Partial regrets for this Friday (Wednesday, 5 February)
• RE: response to semantics comment pfps-01 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RE: response to semantics comment pfps-01 (Tuesday, 4 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: response to issue pfps-09 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 (second try) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: response to issue pfps-06 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: response to comment pfps-05 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: response to comment pfps-04 (Tuesday, 4 February)

Seth Russell

• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call (Thursday, 13 February)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Two questions about bagid (Tuesday, 11 February)

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2003 20:36:28 UTC