- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 08:35:21 -0600
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Pat, For substantive issues, i.e. those in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/ please don't send a response to the commentor until the WG has agreed to your proposed disposition. (You can write a "thanks for the comment, stay tuned" msg, but not a "here's how we disposed of your comment(s)"). And when you do write to the commentor, pls do it in the original thread, with words the commentor will recognize in the subject, and a copy to www-rdf-comments. What I'd like you to write to the WG is your proposal for how we should dispose of the comments. Perhaps that's what you've been doing. But copying the commentor without making it clear that you're not (yet) speaking for the WG seems awkward. Not speaking as nor for the chair, but presumably consistent with him... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0048.html with my one good hand... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Feb/0008.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 09:35:53 UTC