W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:54:17 +0000
Message-ID: <3E5F7819.9010108@hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 06:14, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>At 10:04 PM 2/27/03 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
>>>It's not exactly RFC2396's absolute URI plus optional fragment;
>>>that doesn't include http://example/Andr&#567; ,
>>>which may be in the vocab of an RDF interpretation.
>>>This non-ascii stuff is the bit that's too new to
>>>import from any ratified spec.
>>>cf. TAG issue IRIEverywhere-27, cited from concepts section
>>>6.4 RDF URI References).

The williams issues are relevant here.

He doesn't like the term RDF URI Reference because:
1: it looks like RDF doing its own thing rather than following other 
peoples' leads (despite the fact we were trying to follow charmod)
2: an HTTP URI reference starts http: ...

He likes the term IRI, we could import this term from XML Namespaces 1.1;
and it does not have "reference" in it but is very nearly what we use 
except for the NFC stuff.

I think we should await input from I18N before nailing this one down.

Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 09:54:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:20 UTC