- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:19:59 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 03:03 PM 2/3/03 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >The key point however is that this information - about being a bag - does >not impose any restrictions on formal interpretations which can be >expressed as valid entailments. There are no valid entailments about rdf >Bags that are not also valid of rdf Seqs; the rdf model theory isn't able >to distinguish between bags and sequences; Is this particular point expressed this succinctly in the text? (I'm thinking this might be a crisper way of exemplifying the formal/other meaning issue in Concepts) #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 12:48:04 UTC