- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:51:01 +0000
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
OK Brian McBride wrote: > At 11:08 27/02/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > >> Agenda request for tomorrows telecon. > > > > >> [My attempts to have this discussed in WebOnt have failed]. > > > Is see the webont chairs haven't decided yet: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0401.html > > I have asked via the cg if they would like our input. I'm inclined to > postpone a little bit till we hear from them. > > Brian > > > > > > > >> The current AS&S WD of WebOnt >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics >> >> permits the following in OWL Lite: >> >> <owl:Class rdf:about="⪚Bag"/> >> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&eg:_1"/> >> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&eg:_2"/> >> <eg:Bag> >> <eg:1> >> <owl:Thing/> >> </eg:1> >> </eg:Bag> >> >> but prohibits from OWL Lite: >> >> <owl:Class rdf:about="&rdf;Bag"/> >> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&rdf:_1"/> >> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&rdf:_2"/> >> <rdf:Bag> >> <rdf:1> >> <owl:Thing/> >> </rdf:1> >> </rdf:Bag> >> >> >> (Both examples may include rdfs:comments indicating that the informal >> semantics intended is that of an rdf:Bag - an informal semantics that >> is not >> formally supported either in OWL Lite or RDF). >> >> Both examples are in OWL Full and have identical semantics in OWL Full >> (except that the URIs of the classes and properties differ). >> >> This appears to be an unmotivated failure of interoperability between OWL >> Lite and RDF. >> >> I suggest that this WG may like to either: >> - make a comment asking for a rationale on public-webont-comments >> or >> - ask Brian to raise this at the coordination group. >> >> Jeremy >> >> [My attempts to have this discussed in WebOnt have failed]. > >
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 04:51:21 UTC