- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:54:48 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, pfps@research.bell-labs.com
Danc - please convey my sympathies to your finger At 10:48 05/02/2003 -0600, pat hayes wrote: [...] >>And when you do write to the commentor, pls do it in >>the original thread, > >I feel in a bind here. Brian asked me not to CC to rdf-comments, so I >can't use the original thread. I wasn't clear. Clarifying the comment is part of the process and should go on rdf comments so that we actually have a clarified comment there. Hopefully that will take 0-2 exchanges of messages - what I'm keen to avoid are big sprawling discussion threads that will make it hard to track what's happening. The thread on pfps-07 ending in: [[Oh, I see. It is significant for *ill-formed* typed literals. ]] But I don't want to see "that will be fixed" without a change id. As it stands that thread proposes two changes - I'd prefer the thread ended with a summary of all the changes proposed in the thread. I'm micromanaging here. Sorry. Brian
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 16:53:50 UTC