Re: Last Call Comments Process

>Pat,
>
>Now we are in last call, we have to be a bit more disciplined about 
>handling comments.

OK, sorry I was too fast with the comments.  Im now back fully 
connected, WHAT a relief!!

>  We discussed the process for handling last call comments on 
>Friday's telecon.  To some extent we are figuring it out as we go 
>along, but here is the gist of what I have in mind:
>
>   o comment arrives in www-rdf-comments@w3.org
>   o if its an "immediate response" e.g. "we say that in section 
>xx.yy" then the editor responds pointing this out and hopefully the 
>commentor agrees and that's all very lightweight.

OK. I can send immediate responses to the following, with your go-ahead:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0179.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0159.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0125.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0138.html

>   o if its not an easy response, the editor requests a comment id 
>from me, and the comment gets added to the lc comments list:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/issues.rdf
>
>  o such comments are discussed by the WG and a disposition agreed, 
>actions recorded and feedback sent to the commentor, who may accept 
>the resolution or raise an objection.

OK, I will respond to the WG with suggested responses to the things 
in my editorial baliwick.

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam

Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 12:43:36 UTC