- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:00:25 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 12:17 PM 2/25/03 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >Graham, I am also rather worried about this, which I simply didnt notice >before (mia culpa). Can we at least have some discussion? I mean, surely >we cannot go on record as saying that any URIref with a fragID in RDF >*denotes* whatever that fragID would mean to any application. That would >make "rdf:type" for example refer to a place in a web page, or to whatever >an HTML browser would interpret it to mean. So what did you mean here by >'identifies' ? > >Or am I not following you at all here?? The intent was to *not* make this claim. Which I suggest is more evidence that the wording is unclear. I think I need to ensure any new text is circulated for review. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 10:58:23 UTC