W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:00:25 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 12:17 PM 2/25/03 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>Graham, I am also rather worried about this, which I simply didnt notice 
>before (mia culpa). Can we at least have some discussion? I mean, surely 
>we cannot go on record as saying that any URIref with a fragID in RDF 
>*denotes* whatever that fragID would mean to any application. That would 
>make "rdf:type" for example refer to a place in a web page, or to whatever 
>an HTML browser would interpret it to mean. So what did you mean here by 
>'identifies' ?
>Or am I not following you at all here??

The intent was to *not* make this claim.  Which I suggest is more evidence 
that the wording is   unclear.  I think I need to ensure any new text is 
circulated for review.


Graham Klyne
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 10:58:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:20 UTC