- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:51:23 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 11:08 27/02/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Agenda request for tomorrows telecon. >[My attempts to have this discussed in WebOnt have failed]. Is see the webont chairs haven't decided yet: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0401.html I have asked via the cg if they would like our input. I'm inclined to postpone a little bit till we hear from them. Brian >The current AS&S WD of WebOnt >http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics > >permits the following in OWL Lite: > ><owl:Class rdf:about="⪚Bag"/> ><owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&eg:_1"/> ><owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&eg:_2"/> ><eg:Bag> > <eg:1> > <owl:Thing/> > </eg:1> ></eg:Bag> > >but prohibits from OWL Lite: > ><owl:Class rdf:about="&rdf;Bag"/> ><owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&rdf:_1"/> ><owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&rdf:_2"/> ><rdf:Bag> > <rdf:1> > <owl:Thing/> > </rdf:1> ></rdf:Bag> > > >(Both examples may include rdfs:comments indicating that the informal >semantics intended is that of an rdf:Bag - an informal semantics that is not >formally supported either in OWL Lite or RDF). > >Both examples are in OWL Full and have identical semantics in OWL Full >(except that the URIs of the classes and properties differ). > >This appears to be an unmotivated failure of interoperability between OWL >Lite and RDF. > >I suggest that this WG may like to either: >- make a comment asking for a rationale on public-webont-comments >or >- ask Brian to raise this at the coordination group. > >Jeremy > >[My attempts to have this discussed in WebOnt have failed].
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 18:50:20 UTC