- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:37:38 +0000 (GMT)
- To: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
(LC comments appear starting the 23 Jan) (that is, the thread starting with message 0192) - a pointer to the comment status tracking page doesn't appear to be on the WG home page. I've summarised all threads with comments below. In future messages, I'll only summarise _new_ threads. Stuff that's been assigned an issue number and stuff that's been closed won't show up. Stuff where dialogue started but no issue numbers or closure has happened will still appear. Marc Carrion's "abstract class" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0073.html Ongoing discussion(?) Brian has tracking IDs for the following issues: PFPS untyped literals: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0085.html Pat responded PFPS datatypes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0086.html Pat responded PFPS typed literals: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0087.html Pat responds PFPS typed literals + lang tags: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0088.html Pat responds. PFPS XML literals and LV http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0089.html Pat responds PSPF RDFS closure rules: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0090.html Pat responds PFPS RDF closure rules: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0091.html Pat responds PFPS translation into lbase: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0092.html Response from Pat PFPS lbase / xml literals: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0093.html Response from Pat PFPS xml schema datatypes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0094.html Pat responds Other messages: Guus Schreiber comments on rdfs: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0110.html Brian asked for clarification DanC issues -01 and -02: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0112.html Assigned tracking numbers, discussion continues on rdfcore Joseph Reagle on canonicalisation & co: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0128.html Brian assigns two tracking numbers. PFPS blank node identifiers in syntax: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0119.html Dave responds proposing his fix. PFPS on informal meaning in RDFS vocabulary: Brian summarises and records as pfps-11 PFPS on non-well-formed lists in vocab: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0155.html Brian summarises and records as pfps-12 Bob MacGregor: two comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0125.html Frank and Bob in clarification (no issue yet?) Daniel Kreck: emptyPropertyElt ambiguity http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0127.html Recorded as kreck-01 PFPS: Can RDF say anything about anything? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0148.html Brian seeking clarification, example. PFPS: what's an RDF namespace? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0150.html Patrick Stickler agrees; Pete Johnston agrees; no disposition. PFPS: what's an rdf datatype? (ie, what about the facets?) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0152.html Recorded as pfps-13 Arjohn Kampman: duplicate axioms in RDF MT doc http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0156.html Pat acks, will be fixed. No [close] Arjohn Kampman: rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf ??? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0159.html Pat acks, will be fixed, no [close] Martin Duerst: URi -> URI http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0163.html Typo, but no ack. Ossi Nykaanen: multiple comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0166.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0179.html Brian seeks clarification: discussion or an issue? Pete Johnston: typos in examples: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0188.html Frank acks; no [closed] PFPS the meaning of RDF Tokens: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0191.html Pat responds PFPS social meaning and RDF: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0191.htm Response from Pat, folloup from Seth, gentle "get orf our -comments list!" from Brian - no resolution I can see thus far. Not clear if this is a new issue or should be merged with other PFPS social meaning comments. Dangling things: jan grant: test case issue http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0108.html Dangling! jan to follow up saying he agrees with himself :-) PFPS: divergences between rdf semantics and rdf schema http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0124.html No followup that I can see. Danbri: typo in tc charter intro http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0132.html No followup; fix and close! DanC: semantics typo (misplaced paren) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0137.html No followup PFPS: what is RDF Schema? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0149.html No followup PFPS: what is the expressive power of RDF? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0154.html No followup PFPS: rdf graphs in RDF Semantics http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0174.html No followup. [closed] things: JJC on testSchema: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0115.html Agreed, fixed, [closed] sent (won't appear in future summaries) -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Q: What's yellow and equivalent to the axiom of choice? A: Zorn's lemon.
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 05:38:46 UTC