- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 18:06:10 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Pat, Can I suggest you reply to jjc's email to Joseph pointing out the text you have here and ask him if he feels that covers the issue. There's a good chance he will withdraw the comment. Brian At 09:26 03/02/2003 -0800, pat hayes wrote: >Re. >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0162.html, >I'm afraid I do not understand what the issue is to which I am expected to >respond. The semantics document introduces the xsd:prefix with the >following text (section 0.2): > >"We will also make extensive use of the Qname prefixes rdf:, rdfs: and >xsd: defined as follows: > >Prefix rdf: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# > >Prefix rdfs: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# > >Prefix xsd: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# > >Since Qname syntax is not legal N-triples syntax, and in the interests of >brevity and readability, we will use the convention whereby a Qname is >used without surrounding angle brackets to indicate the corresponding >uriref enclosed in angle brackets, eg the triple > ><ex:a> rdf:type rdfs:Property . > >should be read as an abbreviation for the N-triples syntax > ><ex:a> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> ><http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Property> ." > >Can someone (Jeremy?) tell me in what way this is misleading? > >Pat >-- >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home >40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax >FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell >phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes >s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 13:05:03 UTC