W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:17:21 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 11:16 18/02/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:
>At 10:43 PM 2/13/03 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>>At 21:32 13/02/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>>>I am posting this message to three lists, sorry for duplicate copies.
>>>There has been a significant discussion on the social meaning
>>>parts of the RDF Concepts Last Call.
>>Really!  Where?
>There's been some discussion on WebOnt, starting here:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0280.html
>Also, it doesn't count as discussion, but I indicated a position here:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0228.html
>But I'll agree with you that there's not yet been sufficient discussion to 
>see where this is going.

Thanks Graham, the pointers were very useful.

Jeremy is suggesting - lets see if we can find a form of words that 
satisfies everyone.  I'm hoping that doesn't mean fudging the issue.  I'm 
also very concerned that you won't be present if there is a f2f discussion 
at the tech plenary.  Maybe we should be thinking about dialing you in?

I'm also wondering about laying some of the groundwork.  I'm seeing a lot 
of very unstructured discussion, and I fear there is great risk of 
confusion clouding the discussion.

Do you and Jeremy have any ideas on how we might best prepare/clarify the 

Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 12:16:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:20 UTC