- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:17:21 +0000
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 11:16 18/02/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote: >At 10:43 PM 2/13/03 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: > >>At 21:32 13/02/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >> >> >>>I am posting this message to three lists, sorry for duplicate copies. >>> >>>There has been a significant discussion on the social meaning >>>parts of the RDF Concepts Last Call. >> >>Really! Where? > >There's been some discussion on WebOnt, starting here: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0280.html > >Also, it doesn't count as discussion, but I indicated a position here: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0228.html > >But I'll agree with you that there's not yet been sufficient discussion to >see where this is going. Thanks Graham, the pointers were very useful. Jeremy is suggesting - lets see if we can find a form of words that satisfies everyone. I'm hoping that doesn't mean fudging the issue. I'm also very concerned that you won't be present if there is a f2f discussion at the tech plenary. Maybe we should be thinking about dialing you in? I'm also wondering about laying some of the groundwork. I'm seeing a lot of very unstructured discussion, and I fear there is great risk of confusion clouding the discussion. Do you and Jeremy have any ideas on how we might best prepare/clarify the question. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 12:16:44 UTC