- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:42:06 +0000 (GMT)
- To: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Jan Grant wrote: (LC comments appear starting the 23 Jan) (that is, the thread starting with message 0192) - a pointer to the comment status tracking page doesn't appear to be on the WG home page. Stuff that Brian's allocated tracking IDs for no longer appear, since I presume he'll chase these down himself. (By the way, occasionally I use "OP" to signify "original poster" below) New things: Herman ter Horst on RDF graph equality http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0203.html General comment in support of terminological change, no followup. PFPS: error in semantics document http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0206.html He's right, and I thought I'd seen Pat respond, but there's no followup in the archive I can see. PFPS: questionable statement in RDF semantics http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0208.html He's got a point (although it's borderline), no followup. Olivier Corby on XMLLiteral http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0209.html Pat responds: does his answer satisfy? No ack from OP yet. Bob MacGragor on Statings "Much ado about nothing" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0211.html Call to ditch semantics section 3.2.1. Maybe Brian should pick this up? Dan Brickley: editorial suggestion for RDF test cases http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0212.html Jan acks, suggests striking the slightly obsolete text. Danbri's ok with that, final disposition required. Dan C: reification lacks examples http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0215.html Brian gives this id danc-03, will not appear in future summaries Dan C: PICS, RDF, bagid, examples? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0216.html Danbri: not on your nelly. Note in question needs revision. Solicits opinions from Ralph. [note not part of LC documents, will not chase next week] Qu Yuzhong on RDF Semantics: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0220.html No followup. Qu Yuzhong on appendix A of schema/vocab: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0219.html No followup. Dave Hodder on syntax / xhtml and rdf: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0221.html Assigned id hodder-01; won't appear here next week. Tim BL (A developer) on bagid: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0226.html Lots of followup, no disposition yet. Pat Hayes on lang tags in typed literals: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0228.html Pat Stickler agrees; Brian concerned about second LC. No disposition yet. epromote on business broadband: Looks like a fantastic offer to me, how can you refuse? Stuart Williams with a load of comments on concepts: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0238.html No response yet (just a day or two old) Erick Calder typo in schema http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0243.html No ack. Older messages updated status: Guus Schreiber comments on rdfs: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0110.html Brian asked for clarification, no response. PFPS blank node identifiers in syntax: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0119.html Dave responds proposing his fix. Bob MacGregor: two comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0125.html Frank and Bob in clarification (no issue yet?) PFPS: Can RDF say anything about anything? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0148.html Brian seeking clarification, example. Clarification supplied, n tracking numbers yet. PFPS: what's an RDF namespace? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0150.html Patrick Stickler agrees; Pete Johnston agrees; no disposition. Arjohn Kampman: duplicate axioms in RDF MT doc http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0156.html Pat acks, will be fixed. No [close] Arjohn Kampman: rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf ??? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0159.html Pat acks, will be fixed, no [close] Martin Duerst: URi -> URI http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0163.html Typo, but no ack. (no tracking number) Pete Johnston: typos in examples: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0188.html Frank acks; no [closed] PFPS the meaning of RDF Tokens: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0191.html Pat responds Frank: is this the same as an earlier comment? (no response yet) PFPS social meaning and RDF: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0191.htm Seth's comments are LCcomments until we know otherwise - bwm. Dangling things: Ossi Nykaanen: multiple comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0166.html No followup (two weeks) PFPS: divergences between rdf semantics and rdf schema http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0124.html No followup that I can see. (Two weeks now) DanC: semantics typo (misplaced paren) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0137.html No followup PFPS: what is RDF Schema? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0149.html No followup (Two weeks, this might be being chased in another thread?) PFPS: what is the expressive power of RDF? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0154.html No followup (two weeks) PFPS: rdf graphs in RDF Semantics http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0174.html No followup (two weeks) [closed] things: Marc Carrion's "abstract class" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0073.html [closed], not an issue, "This can wait" Ossi Nykaanen: multiple comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0179.html [closed], discussion died. jan grant: test case issue http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0108.html [closed], disposition was accepted. Danbri: typo in tc charter intro http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0132.html [closed], typo acked -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ "NOP" is a trivial implementation of an executable Z subset.
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 06:44:10 UTC