- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:31:52 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>At 03:03 PM 2/3/03 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >>The key point however is that this information - about being a bag >>- does not impose any restrictions on formal interpretations which >>can be expressed as valid entailments. There are no valid >>entailments about rdf Bags that are not also valid of rdf Seqs; the >>rdf model theory isn't able to distinguish between bags and >>sequences; > >Is this particular point expressed this succinctly in the text? Maybe not. It has the following: "There are no special semantic conditions on the container vocabulary: the only 'structure' which RDF presumes its containers to have is what can be inferred from the use of this vocabulary and the semantic conditions on the rest of the RDF vocabulary." Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 15:30:13 UTC