- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:26:17 -0800
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Re. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0162.html, I'm afraid I do not understand what the issue is to which I am expected to respond. The semantics document introduces the xsd:prefix with the following text (section 0.2): "We will also make extensive use of the Qname prefixes rdf:, rdfs: and xsd: defined as follows: Prefix rdf: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# Prefix rdfs: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# Prefix xsd: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# Since Qname syntax is not legal N-triples syntax, and in the interests of brevity and readability, we will use the convention whereby a Qname is used without surrounding angle brackets to indicate the corresponding uriref enclosed in angle brackets, eg the triple <ex:a> rdf:type rdfs:Property . should be read as an abbreviation for the N-triples syntax <ex:a> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Property> ." Can someone (Jeremy?) tell me in what way this is misleading? Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 12:24:36 UTC