thoughts on new document
Outline of the RDFCore documents
New RDF document
TEST: literals
Proposal for closure of rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes
- Re: Proposal for closure of rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes
- Re: Proposal for closure of rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes
*。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。*
literals, again.
Agenda for telecon 2002-06-28
weekly call for agenda items
Fwd: XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2
- Re: Fwd: XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2
- Re: Fwd: XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2
datatypes message - draft 2
Issue list
rdfms-syntax-incomplete
- Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete
- Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete
- Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete
- Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete
Minutes of F2F Meeting 17/18 June 2002
literals, language, xml
Syntax: id symbol expansion
MT RDFS closure rule bug?
Update of new RDF document
procedure for determining reserved vocab
Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify?
Outline for new RDF document
- Re: Outline for new RDF document
- Re: Outline for new RDF document
- Re: Outline for new RDF document
- Re: Outline for new RDF document
- Re: Outline for new RDF document
Draft datatypes message
- Re: Draft datatypes message
- Re: Draft datatypes message
- RE: Draft datatypes message
- Re: Draft datatypes message
- Re: Draft datatypes message
no rdfcore teleconference scheduled for today 2002-06-21
regrets
Cannes entailment, a question:
Regarding my recent post: inquiry.txt
Relationships between terms, statements and schemas and proper application behavior
<s,l,x>-literals considered harmless
Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify?
- Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify?
from patrick: inquiry.txt
aside notes re rdfms-assertion
from Patrick
grahams rdfms-assertion text
rdfs schema / namespace update
regrets
[w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none>
超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 CQ3FGodB0zRUMuHJjOcbS
Pre-F2F bar chat
datatyping unstaked
Agenda for RDFCore Telecon 2002-06-14
the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary
- Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary
- Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary
- Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary
- Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary
Issue list status
Issue faq-html-compliance
weekly call for agenda items
Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative
- Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative
- Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative
- RE: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative
- Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative
- RE: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative
- Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative
- Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative
namespaces as punctuation, was: new semantics initiative
Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
new semantics initiative
- Re: new semantics initiative
- Re: new semantics initiative
- new semantics initiative drafts
- Re: new semantics initiative
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-06-07
Datatypes at F2F
WebOnt WG response to RDF Schema Working Draft (fwd)
Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
- Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics