- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:29:11 +0300
- To: ext Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-06-10 19:01, "ext Eric Miller" <em@w3.org> wrote:
> Now that i'm back online, I see Patrick's suggestion...
>
> On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 11:15, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>
>> My specific recommendations are:
>>
>> 1. Leave the definition of rdfs:isDefinedBy as is, though removing
>> the incorrect language about namespaces, allowing any instance
>> of rdf:Resource and multiple statements.
>>
>> 2. Qualify objects of rdfs:isDefinedBy by class, in the case of
>> RDF/XML instances, by the proposed rdfs:Schema class. This permits
>> those who want/need to, to be explicit about the nature of the
>> defining resource.
>>
>> 3. Clearly state that there is no functional relationship between
>> the URI of a term and the namespace URI used in its RDF/XML
>> serialization -- that the RDF model is based on URIs, not
>> qnames, and as such, namespaces have no significance whatsoever.
>
> yep, i believe we're saying similar things.
>
> Patrick, have you taken a crack at this rewording?
Not yet, but I would be happy to do so prior to Friday's telecon.
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 04:12:01 UTC