- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 12:11:05 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>
- cc: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, R.V.Guha wrote: > This is not just a single namespace. It is a space of namespaces. So, > some terms from owl will be in it. As will some terms from daml-s and > so on. Any term inroduced by any future language to deal with logical > machinery (e.g., log:implies by cwm/euler), should be designatable as > going into this namspace so that RDF doesn't think its a simple triple. This is a nice high level overview, thanks. I would like to see "to deal with logical machinery" fleshed out in more detail. Can you offer a more detailed account? What counts as "dealing with logical machinery"? (I fear a repeat of the rdfs:ConstraintResource mistake, where we didn't have a clear notion of which future classes/properties would be flagged). Dan > guha > > patrick hayes wrote: > > > > >> At 12:07 12/06/2002 -0500, patrick hayes wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >>> What is wrong with URI inspection? > >> > >> > >> Questions: > >> > >> o what uri prefix should be used? Is it ok to insist on an http: > >> prefix? > > > > > > I would guess so. I would expect that it would be done the same way > > that the W3C handles the RDF and RDFS vocabulary, by a URL linking to > > a set-in-stone page. > > > >> o how will names in this namespace be allocated? > > > > > > Do you mean how procedurally? Thats up the W3C. I would guess that a > > WG would submit some kind of application to some internal secretariat, > > or something like that. Isnt this kind of stuff all set out in the W3C > > process manual somewhere? For example, we are proposing to create an > > rdfd: namespace, right? Like that. > > > > Pat > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 15 June 2002 12:11:10 UTC