- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 03:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- cc: "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Patrick Stickler wrote: > > On 2002-06-25 19:06, "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com> wrote: > > > If darkness is specified by the addition of something to the graph, then > > there is no way to avoid non-mon. We have been over this many times now. > > Could we please stop reopening this issue? > > > > ... > > > > Darkness specification has to be *in the language*, not in a particular > > file using the language. > > Would you say that the approach of using reification to express > unasserted triples is "in the language" and thus avoids > non-monotonicity? No. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 03:36:53 UTC