- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 12:12:55 +0300
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-06-03 11:58, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> The chair asked for stuff for the f2f.
>
> Here's my take.
>
> A. We clearly need to close as many of the remaining issues as possible.
>
> B. Review of Datatypes WD
> - we should publish a datatypes WD straight after the f2f.
Agreed. So long as the WG still feels it reflects a majority view.
> E. reassessment of closed issues
> ...
> Issues in my mind include:
> - rdfms-syntax-incomplete
> - should a literal's structure be represented in the graph (e.g.
> xml:lang)
- tidy literals (seriously, note no smileys)
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 3 June 2002 05:09:46 UTC