- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 21:04:35 +0100
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 04:50 PM 6/25/02 +0100, Jan Grant wrote: >Would it not be simpler to say that > > <property xml:lang="fr">chat</property> > >was a syntactic shorthand for something like > > <property rdf:parsetype="Literal"> > <xml:something xml:lang="fr">char</xml:something> > </property> > >? - in other words, punt the language tag into the XML realm, keep >literals as simple strings (or the string representation of XML content) >and make Pat happier? > >This has been done to death, but I've had a scan back and I don't recall >this coming up before - further apologies if it has already been raised. I don't remember seeing anything like that before, either. The biggest problem I see here is deciding what the <xml:something> should be. I portend complications here, but can't see what they are. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 16:19:48 UTC