- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:20:36 +0300
- To: "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-06-25 19:06, "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com> wrote: > If darkness is specified by the addition of something to the graph, then > there is no way to avoid non-mon. We have been over this many times now. > Could we please stop reopening this issue? > > ... > > Darkness specification has to be *in the language*, not in a particular > file using the language. Would you say that the approach of using reification to express unasserted triples is "in the language" and thus avoids non-monotonicity? Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 03:16:06 UTC