- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:20:36 +0300
- To: "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-06-25 19:06, "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com> wrote:
> If darkness is specified by the addition of something to the graph, then
> there is no way to avoid non-mon. We have been over this many times now.
> Could we please stop reopening this issue?
>
> ...
>
> Darkness specification has to be *in the language*, not in a particular
> file using the language.
Would you say that the approach of using reification to express
unasserted triples is "in the language" and thus avoids
non-monotonicity?
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 03:16:06 UTC