- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 09:44:51 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
At 12:38 AM 6/12/02 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote: >I have to think about the dark triples stuff some more in the light of >these proposal. Sometimes it all sounds like quasi-mystical voodoo, other >times (like today) it seems like a re-characterisation of stuff from >M+S'99, ie: > >http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/ [[ >When an RDF processor encounters an XML element or attribute name that >is declared to be from a namespace whose name begins with the string >"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax" and the processor does not recognize >the semantics of that name then the processor is required to skip (i.e., >generate no tuples for) the entire XML element, including its content, >whose name is unrecognized or that has an attribute whose name is >unrecognized. >]] Not quote, I think. The above wording means that certain statements don't make it into the graph. My understanding of Pat/Guha's proposal is that they make it into the graph but don't affect its truth denotation. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 05:23:12 UTC