- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 27 Jun 2002 12:46:01 -0500
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 01:40, Patrick Stickler wrote: > > > On 2002-06-26 20:38, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > > > In the introduction, it would be good, I think, to add a comment > that the tidy/untidy issue has little to do with implementational > efficiency of triples stores, not true; see comments from Sergey a long time ago about the cost of untidy literals in RDF/database systems. Sorry I don't have time to find it. The swap/cwm implementation would suffer a significant efficiency hit if literals weren't tidy. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/ esp in def loadToStore(store, addr): store.storeQuad((store._experience, store.semantics, store.intern((SYMBOL, addr)), store.intern((FORMULA, addr + "#_formula" )))) -- http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/llyn.py > but is a conceptual distinction > relating to the graph semantics and that there are numerous ways > for actual implementations to compress untidyness in the conceptual > graph in an actual triples store, etc. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 13:45:34 UTC