- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 27 Jun 2002 12:46:01 -0500
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 01:40, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>
>
> On 2002-06-26 20:38, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
>
> In the introduction, it would be good, I think, to add a comment
> that the tidy/untidy issue has little to do with implementational
> efficiency of triples stores,
not true; see comments from Sergey a long time ago about
the cost of untidy literals in RDF/database systems.
Sorry I don't have time to find it.
The swap/cwm implementation would suffer a significant
efficiency hit if literals weren't tidy.
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/
esp in def loadToStore(store, addr):
store.storeQuad((store._experience,
store.semantics,
store.intern((SYMBOL, addr)),
store.intern((FORMULA, addr + "#_formula" ))))
-- http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/llyn.py
> but is a conceptual distinction
> relating to the graph semantics and that there are numerous ways
> for actual implementations to compress untidyness in the conceptual
> graph in an actual triples store, etc.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 13:45:34 UTC