- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 18 Jun 2002 11:31:04 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 10:14, Brian McBride wrote: > > > For the RDF Community to answer... > > Question 1: > > Given the RDF graph: > > <rdf:RDF > xmlns:rdf ="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns ="uuid:f89496c0-82c3-11d6-9832-0003931df47c#"> > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="#Jenny"> > <ex:age>10</ex:age> > </rdf:Description> > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="#Film"> > <ex:title>10</ex:title> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> > > Which of the following most accurately captures the meaning > expressed in the above graph? I object to asking a question about a formalism in (exclusively) intuitive terms. I propose making it a test case instead or in addition, ala... # how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Dan Connolly (Wed, Jan 30 2002) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jan/0199.html and regarding the 2nd question, since you made up the name uuid:f89496c0-82c3-11d6-9832-0003931df47c#integer, please also make up an arbitrary name for the relationship betwen #age and #integer; i.e. don't use rdfs:range. Or: ask the question twice: once with rdfs:range, and once with rdfd:dcv as in http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Datatyping060102_draft.html#ntoc_4.3 > Given the RDF graph: > > <rdf:RDF > xmlns:rdf ="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:rdfs ="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" > xmlns ="uuid:f89496c0-82c3-11d6-9832-0003931df47c#"> > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="#age"> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#integer"/> > </rdf:Description> -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 12:30:52 UTC