- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 08:39:05 +0200
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Issues: + legal uses of rdf:Description + obsoleting rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007 Good news: I now have a (not yet public) version of ARP that passes nearly all the test cases from the April publication. This is driven from the Manifest file Bad news: the errors ... The ones it doesn't attempt are: (Manifest is unhelpful, tests themselves are probably OK) nested-bag-IDs/test010a nested-bag-IDs/test011a nested-bag-IDs/test012a nested-bag-IDs/test010b nested-bag-IDs/test011b nested-bag-IDs/test012b Should be obsoleted: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007 Plain wrong (IMO): rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-013 rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-026 i.e. test-013 legal <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/node1"> <rdf:Description rdf:resource="http://example.org/node2" /> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> test-026 legal <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/node1" rdf:Description="string" /> These are about rdf:Description being used as a property name. I see rdf:Description as a syntactic word like rdf:ID or rdf:about, and it is not and never can be the predicate of a triple. (Not withstanding my proposal about the RDF Graph!). Also I did not find the minute approving these test cases; the link from the Test Cases WD takes us to the action to create them. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0651.html [[[ ACTION 2001-11-30#4 Dave Beckett: Create test cases covering reserved use of rdf names in this proposal. ]]] (Of course I wouldn't raise a procedural question if I hadn't discovered that I disagreed with the outcome!) Other Manifest errors (Apr 29) include: missing test:warning on unrecognised-xml-attributes/test001 unrecognised-xml-attributes/test002 and possibly on some of the rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-0XX ARP is also happy with all the PENDING test cases in the April 29 zip. I should get ARP running off the web site today, currently I am testing against the zip; it will fail the charmod-uri tests still since I haven't sorted that yet. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 7 June 2002 02:33:12 UTC