- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 10:24:19 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <27808.1023528259@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said: > I spoke too soon > > I now have a (not yet public) version of ARP that passes nearly all > > In truth I had a broken test harness :( > > Moreover having fixed a bug in the test harness there are now rather more > bugs in both ARP and the test cases apparant. Yes, I am in a similar situation stomping bugs in my software and the test cases (Incidently many of the test cases changes have all lines changed, so 'cvs diff' won't work and a visual inspection or hand-editing is required to see the changes.) > Some in the test cases include: > > rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf I concur. This needed updating for rdf:ID on a property, a very early test and we only quite recently decided on that meaning. I also took the opportunity to make the test clearer; used legal http://example.org URIs, removed extraneous triples not needed for the test and removed some of the many foo/bar values to make the answer clearer. I attach my new versions of the test004.rdf and test004.nt > rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-025.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-025.rdf I also concur with this bug; already reported to Jan - rdf:li instead of rdf:_1 in ntriples (but hey, most of the 50+ machine generated tests seem OK!) > xmlbase/test014.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlbase/test014.rdf Yes this is wrong. You have a correct fix > > ARP is still buggy around the xml-literals but some of those test cases have > neglected the language tags. You also fixed: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/test2.nt I agree (URL \u escaping) rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test002.nt rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test003.nt I don't see any change; the latest versions of these in the CVS contains the xml"" fixes, which I updated in early May for several tests rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test008.nt I can't tell what you changed here, even with fixing the line endings, it looks significantly different but more correct given the rdf:ID clarification. I think it might benefit from adding an rdf:about to the rdf:Description since that isn't important to this test, and renaming some of the bnodes from _j:<n>. _:j0 would turn into a uri-ref, if the rdf:about was added and _:j3 is the reified statement node. The absence of _:j1 and _:j2 is unnecessary I think. Cheers Dave
# # Copyright World Wide Web Consortium, (Massachusetts Institute of # Technology, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en # Automatique, Keio University). # # All Rights Reserved. # # Please see the full Copyright clause at # <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software.html> # # $Id$ # ##################################################################### <http://example.org/node1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_1> "1" . <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Statement> . <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#subject> <http://example.org/node1> . <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#predicate> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_1> . <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#object> "1" . <http://example.org/node1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_2> xml"2" . <http://example.org/node1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_3> _:res . _:res <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://example.org/node2> . <http://example.org/node1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_4> _:res2 . <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e4> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Statement> . <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e4> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#subject> <http://example.org/node1> . <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e4> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#predicate> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_4> . <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e4> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#object> _:res2 . _:res2 <http://example.org/ns#prop1> "blah" .
Attachments
- application/rdf+xml attachment: test004.rdf
Received on Saturday, 8 June 2002 05:27:38 UTC