- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:37:19 +0300
- To: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-06-26 20:33, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> At 14:32 23/06/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> <Jenny> <age> _:a .
>>> _:a <xsdr:decimal> "10" .
>>
>> What is this 'xsdr:'? This should be 'xsd:decimal'.
>
> Have we decided that we can use the standard xsd URI's for our datatype
> properties and classes? Do they denote the same thing? I didn't think we
> had so left the option open. Maybe I'm being too pernickity.
The current stake-in-the-ground WD, and all recent examples
in WG discussions use 'xsd:' so I would think we have decided
that yes, we can use the standard xsd URIs for datatype
properties.
Having the two different namespace prefixes could simply
confuse folks, especially since 'xsdr:' is both fictional
and undefined in the inquiry.
Cheers,
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 01:32:49 UTC