- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:06:12 +0300
- To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-06-12 13:50, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote: > At 12:30 PM 6/12/02 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: >> On 2002-06-12 11:48, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Fair point but easily fixed, I think. Replace "reserved namespaces" with >>> "reserved URIrefs". If more detail is needed, designate these in terms of >>> reserved URIref prefix strings. >> >> Looks like a job for rdfs:aboutEachPrefix ;-) > > Smiley noted, but I must emphasize that this is *not* a case for > aboutEachPrefix. > > (The point about Pat/Guha's proposal is that the reservation must apply > globally, not in response to something that pops up in the RDF graph. If a > colouring mechanism is to appear in the graph then it must apply > graph-syntactically to every affected triple.) I fully agree. I was actually thinking along the lines of a shift in its scope, whereby it is not a syntactic mechanism, but would become a kind of meta-rule applicable to the entire graph. A kind of log:implies but only allowing prefix matching in the premise. But nevermind... ;-) Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 07:02:01 UTC