- From: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:07:06 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>At 09:52 AM 6/12/02 +0100, Jan Grant wrote: > >>Agreed; I'd rather see some syntactic mechanism for darkening (or more >>generally, colouring*) triples that doesn't rely on URI inspection. In >>particular, URI inspection doesn't need to be written into the MT >>documents - it should just appeal to darkness (or otherwise) that's >>determined through a mechanism external to the document. > >Speaking personally, me too. But that does seem to require a syntax >extension, which may be difficult at this stage. I really do NOT want to introduce a syntax extension, which introduces all kinds of extra complexity. We have agreed that contexts are out of scope. What is wrong with URI inspection? One can inspect opaque URIs. RDF engines are going to have to be able to at least match one uriref with another to see if they are the same, and that is all that is required: if a URI is in a certain (externally defined) list of reserved URIs, then the triple isn't asserted. That's all. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 13:07:08 UTC