- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 07:57:12 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 04:00 PM 6/13/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: >At 12:07 12/06/2002 -0500, patrick hayes wrote: > >[...] > > >>What is wrong with URI inspection? > >Questions: > > o what uri prefix should be used? Is it ok to insist on an http: prefix? IMO: Pick one. It doesn't matter. I think (if we go this route) URI inspection will be a short-term hack and a future rev of RDF should provide a proper syntactic framework. > o how will names in this namespace be allocated? I suggest: by documentation in a W3C recommendation-track publication (or document intended for that track). (I.e. use of this "hack" should be very constrained; the bar should be high.) #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 03:37:29 UTC