- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:30:54 +0300
- To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
On 2002-06-12 11:48, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote: > > Fair point but easily fixed, I think. Replace "reserved namespaces" with > "reserved URIrefs". If more detail is needed, designate these in terms of > reserved URIref prefix strings. Looks like a job for rdfs:aboutEachPrefix ;-) Patrick > #g > -- > > At 09:02 AM 6/12/02 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > >>>>> patrick hayes said: >> >> <snip amount="lots"/> >>> (6) Does this require any changes to syntax/ test cases/ Ntriples/ >>> datatyping/ whatever? >>> A: No. >> >> Until you had used the word 'namespace' in the bit I've cut from >> above, I would say no. When namespace appears in the MT, I'm >> worried. >> >> I just went and checked in the MT WD, and you do use it a few more >> times than I expected. Hmm! >> >> Patrick Stickler has said elsewhere that "namespaces are punctuation" >> which is a bit strong, but for RDF/XML that is mostly correct. RDF >> does not have namespaces in the model (theory). >> >> Dave > > ------------------- > Graham Klyne > <GK@NineByNine.org> > > -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 05:26:44 UTC