Re: new semantics initiative

On 2002-06-12 11:48, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
wrote:

> 
> Fair point but easily fixed, I think.  Replace "reserved namespaces" with
> "reserved URIrefs".  If more detail is needed, designate these in terms of
> reserved URIref prefix strings.

Looks like a job for rdfs:aboutEachPrefix ;-)

Patrick


> #g
> --
> 
> At 09:02 AM 6/12/02 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> 
>>>>> patrick hayes said:
>> 
>> <snip amount="lots"/>
>>> (6) Does this require any changes to syntax/ test cases/ Ntriples/
>>> datatyping/ whatever?
>>> A: No.
>> 
>> Until you had used the word 'namespace' in the bit I've cut from
>> above, I would say no.  When namespace appears in the MT, I'm
>> worried.
>> 
>> I just went and checked in the MT WD, and you do use it a few more
>> times than I expected.  Hmm!
>> 
>> Patrick Stickler has said elsewhere that "namespaces are punctuation"
>> which is a bit strong, but for RDF/XML that is mostly correct.  RDF
>> does not have namespaces in the model (theory).
>> 
>> Dave
> 
> -------------------
> Graham Klyne
> <GK@NineByNine.org>
> 
> 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 05:26:44 UTC