- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:30:54 +0300
- To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
On 2002-06-12 11:48, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
wrote:
>
> Fair point but easily fixed, I think. Replace "reserved namespaces" with
> "reserved URIrefs". If more detail is needed, designate these in terms of
> reserved URIref prefix strings.
Looks like a job for rdfs:aboutEachPrefix ;-)
Patrick
> #g
> --
>
> At 09:02 AM 6/12/02 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
>
>>>>> patrick hayes said:
>>
>> <snip amount="lots"/>
>>> (6) Does this require any changes to syntax/ test cases/ Ntriples/
>>> datatyping/ whatever?
>>> A: No.
>>
>> Until you had used the word 'namespace' in the bit I've cut from
>> above, I would say no. When namespace appears in the MT, I'm
>> worried.
>>
>> I just went and checked in the MT WD, and you do use it a few more
>> times than I expected. Hmm!
>>
>> Patrick Stickler has said elsewhere that "namespaces are punctuation"
>> which is a bit strong, but for RDF/XML that is mostly correct. RDF
>> does not have namespaces in the model (theory).
>>
>> Dave
>
> -------------------
> Graham Klyne
> <GK@NineByNine.org>
>
>
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 05:26:44 UTC