- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 08:04:27 +0200
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 8 June 2002 01:58:06 UTC
I spoke too soon > I now have a (not yet public) version of ARP that passes nearly all In truth I had a broken test harness :( Moreover having fixed a bug in the test harness there are now rather more bugs in both ARP and the test cases apparant. Some in the test cases include: rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/ test004.rdf rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-025.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-025.rdf xmlbase/test014.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlbase/test014.rdf ARP is still buggy around the xml-literals but some of those test cases have neglected the language tags. I attached a zip of modified nt files. Jeremy
Received on Saturday, 8 June 2002 01:58:06 UTC