- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:00:32 +0100
- To: Ronald Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
- Cc: "'Brian McBride'" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:51 AM 6/13/02 -0700, Ronald Daniel wrote: >As a process matter, if we are going to add something important >late in the game, we are also going to allow adequate time for >reviewing it. Its either important enough to face the unpleasant >need to extend the schedule or it is not. I will oppose any effort >to get both. I agree. In my experience, it's getting the review cycles and building consensus that takes time, not putting the material together. Which is why I feel we shouldn't try to do it at the same time as the other documents unless there's a clear reason why that's needed. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 03:37:30 UTC