Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete

On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 06:19, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> At the f2f one of the postponed issues that I wished to advocate reopening was:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-syntax-incomplete
> 
> In particular, given the amount of change we have made I think a small change to
> rectify the bnode serialization problem should be considered.

I don't believe we have made any changes in advance of implementation
experience.

And I hope we don't.

I'm against re-opening this issue, as I haven't seen any working
code and tests, let alone any that represent designs
I like.

Let's please finish this version so we can get on to issues
like this one.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 13:30:03 UTC