- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 08:08:58 +0200
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I am sorry I will not be able to attend this afternoon. Vis-a-vis item 9 [[[ 9: Definition of graph syntax Discuss Jeremy's proposal. ]]] I suspect editorial and style type issues require my presence. There are three substantive issues of which I would hope at least two are wholly non-controversial. The meeting chair may choose to see whether any of these can be closed. A) unattached nodes in RDF graphs Propose: an RDF graph does not contain any nodes except for those that are subject or object of some triple. B) property uri-refs Propose: the predicate of an RDF triple can be any uri ref. C) character model and XML Literals Propose: XML literals in RDF have no character model confromance requirements other than those imposed by the version of XML used in the RDF/XML. [[ This is fairly weak since then a graph read in from XML 1.0 cannot necessarily be written out in XML 1.1. ]] All three of these are represesented in the text I have shared. Given that both Brian and I will be absent, Brian's further suggestions about namespaces, schemas and properties will probably need discussing some other time; so (B), while probably agreeable, needs to remain open. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 7 June 2002 02:02:36 UTC