- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:30:17 +0100
- To: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 12:07 PM 6/12/02 -0500, patrick hayes wrote: >>At 09:52 AM 6/12/02 +0100, Jan Grant wrote: >> >>>Agreed; I'd rather see some syntactic mechanism for darkening (or more >>>generally, colouring*) triples that doesn't rely on URI inspection. In >>>particular, URI inspection doesn't need to be written into the MT >>>documents - it should just appeal to darkness (or otherwise) that's >>>determined through a mechanism external to the document. >> >>Speaking personally, me too. But that does seem to require a syntax >>extension, which may be difficult at this stage. > >I really do NOT want to introduce a syntax extension, which introduces all >kinds of extra complexity. We have agreed that contexts are out of scope. For the avoidance of doubt... I agree: I didn't mean to suggest we _should_ consider introducing a syntax extension at this stage. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 13:24:11 UTC