w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from October to December 2004 by author

18 porn prositute

• Join Teen Movie Zone - you'll see hardcore teens get f...! (Wednesday, 27 October)

Bernard Desruisseaux

• Re: Response when no matching resource was found (Thursday, 16 December)

Betty D Smith

• unempl claim mishandled (Wednesday, 8 December)

Brian Korver

• Re: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt, was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Friday, 24 December)
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt, was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Tuesday, 26 October)

bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu

• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Tuesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 70] REBIND arguments should be like BIND (Monday, 6 December)
• [Bug 70] REBIND arguments should be like BIND (Monday, 6 December)
• [Bug 70] REBIND arguments should be like BIND (Monday, 6 December)
• [Bug 70] REBIND arguments should be like BIND (Monday, 6 December)
• [Bug 70] New: REBIND arguments are like BIND (Monday, 6 December)
• [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 3 December)
• [Bug 69] New: Formatting lost in appendix B.2 (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 68] New: Reference to XML spec (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 67] New: non-ASCII characters (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 66] New: references style (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 65] New: Table of Contents missing (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 64] New: Incorrect IETF boilerplate (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 63] New: typo in 13.16 "name" line (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 62] New: href format (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 61] New: invalid lock token in example (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 60] New: If header evaluation when? (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 59] New: failed LOCK response body (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 58] New: MOVE status 403 description (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 57] New: incorrect section reference (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 56] New: 423 Locked in Multistatus for PROPPATCH? (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 55] New: Multistatus format (empty) (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 54] New: Locks vs multiple bindings (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 53] New: DAV:responsedescription content model (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 52] New: "mandatory" properties (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 51] New: Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY" (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 50] New: Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 49] New: propfind XML description incorrect (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 48] New: XML extensibility description (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 47] New: 3xx in multistatus (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 46] New: URLs in Multistatus (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 45] New: DAV request header (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 44] New: OPTIONS * (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 43] New: "ill-formed" XML (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 42] New: Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 41] New: Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 40] New: Definition of "null resource" gone (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 39] New: Syntax of property names in text content (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 38] New: RFC2396bis update (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 37] New: Sentence lost in introduction (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 36] New: Appendix numbering (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 35] New: RFC2606 compliance (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 34] New: property "URI" (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 33] Terminology in properties section (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 33] New: Terminology in properties section (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 32] New: DAV:displayname handling (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 30] New: incorrect XML in example (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 29] New: refreshing locks (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 28] New: MOVE vs live properties (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 27] New: COPY vs live properties (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 26] New: URL syntax in PROPFIND (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 25] New: lock to unmapped URL (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 24] New: lost-update vs collections (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 23] New: lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 22] New: attributes on properties (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 21] XML element definitions (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 20] lock token example (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite (Saturday, 27 November)
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Wednesday, 24 November)

Elias Sinderson

• Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Friday, 24 December)

Eric Hanson

• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Monday, 25 October)

Frank Lowney

• WebDAV, URL encoding and current Windows clients (Thursday, 9 December)

Geoffrey M Clemm

• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: precondition naming [was Re: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt] (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: question about MOVE and COPY overwriting folders (Saturday, 18 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 14 December)
• RE: [Bug 70] New: REBIND arguments are like BIND (Friday, 10 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 7 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Tuesday, 7 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: REBIND example (was Re: Locks and loopback bindings) (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 3 December)
• RE: Specification philosophies (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Specification philosophies (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Saturday, 23 October)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: BIND issue "binding properties", was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-09.txt (Friday, 10 December)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-08.txt (Monday, 29 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Tuesday, 26 October)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-10.txt (Thursday, 21 October)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-09.txt (Wednesday, 6 October)

Jason Crawford

• Re: BIND issue "binding properties", was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)

Jim Luther

• Re: WebDAV, URL encoding and current Windows clients (Thursday, 9 December)
• Property size limitations (Friday, 12 November)

Jim Whitehead

• RE: precondition naming [was Re: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt] (Thursday, 23 December)
• RE: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 14 December)
• RE: REBIND and lock token submission example (Tuesday, 14 December)
• RE: status of BIND issue 2.6_when_do_ids_change (Monday, 13 December)
• RE: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 13 December)
• RE: REBIND and lock token submission example (Monday, 13 December)
• REBIND and lock token submission example (Friday, 10 December)
• RE: [Bug 70] New: REBIND arguments are like BIND (Friday, 10 December)
• RE: WebDAV, URL encoding and current Windows clients (Thursday, 9 December)
• RE: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Thursday, 9 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Thursday, 9 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Wednesday, 8 December)
• RE: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Wednesday, 8 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• RE: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• RE: Locks and loopback bindings (Friday, 3 December)
• RE: [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• Locks and loopback bindings (Friday, 3 December)
• RE: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 3 December)
• RE: [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 3 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Friday, 3 December)
• RE: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Friday, 3 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: BIND issue 2.3_copy_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Current status of 2518bis? (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Specification philosophies (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Comments on bind-08 (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Tuesday, 16 November)
• RE: Comment on UNBIND language in BIND specification (Friday, 12 November)
• Comment on UNBIND language in BIND specification (Friday, 12 November)

Joe Hildebrand

• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Tuesday, 16 November)
• WebDAV at IETF 61 (Thursday, 21 October)

John Reese

• question about MOVE and COPY overwriting folders (Friday, 17 December)

John Varghese

• Estimate for developing a WebDav server (Monday, 29 November)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: qutoa vs disk space, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Monday, 27 December)
• Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Monday, 27 December)
• Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Friday, 24 December)
• qutoa vs disk space, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Friday, 24 December)
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt, was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Saturday, 18 December)
• Re: Response when no matching resource was found (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Response when no matching resource was found (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: REBIND and lock token submission example (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: status of BIND issue 2.6_when_do_ids_change (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• status of BIND issue 2.6_when_do_ids_change (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: REBIND and lock token submission example (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 70] New: REBIND arguments are like BIND (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: WebDAV, URL encoding and current Windows clients (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Saturday, 4 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Friday, 3 December)
• BIND issue 2.6_when_do_ids_change, was: Comments on bind-08 (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• BIND issue 6_rebind_intro broke REBIND (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: BIND issue 2.3_copy_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• BIND issue 2.3_copy_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Specification philosophies (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-08.txt (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Comment on UNBIND language in BIND specification (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Saturday, 13 November)
• REDIRECT issue "13_allprop": allprop behaviour (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: Comment on UNBIND language in BIND specification (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Comment on UNBIND language in BIND specification (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Comment on UNBIND language in BIND specification (Friday, 12 November)
• BIND: references to RFC2396 (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Friday, 5 November)
• comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt, was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Saturday, 23 October)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: resolving REDIRECT issue lc-58-update (Tuesday, 19 October)
• BIND issue "locking", was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• BIND issue "binding properties", was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• BIND issue permissions, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• BIND issue COPY/MOVE on "same" resouece, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• resolving REDIRECT issue lc-58-update (Saturday, 9 October)
• resolving REDIRECT issue 12.1-property-name (Friday, 8 October)
• resolving REDIRECT issue 3-terminology-redirectref (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: looking for feedback on REDIRECT issue lc-57-noautoupdate (Thursday, 7 October)
• new REDIRECT draft submitted (-09) (Wednesday, 6 October)
• looking for feedback on REDIRECT issue lc-57-noautoupdate (Wednesday, 6 October)
• resolving REDIRECT issue lc-33-forwarding (Wednesday, 6 October)
• resolving REDIRECT issue lc-48-s6 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• resolving REDIRECT issue lc-36-server (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Comments on draft-hildebrand-webdav-notify-00 (Friday, 1 October)

Lisa Dusseault

• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: qutoa vs disk space, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Monday, 27 December)
• Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Monday, 27 December)
• Re: Response when no matching resource was found (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 10 December)
• Fwd: Proceedings from WebDAV from IETF-61 (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [Bug 3] Bindings draft should specify if all properties MUST have same value on all bindings (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Current status of 2518bis? (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Specification philosophies (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Specification philosophies (Thursday, 2 December)
• Specification philosophies (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Bindings and permissions (Thursday, 2 December)
• Bindings and permissions (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Comments on bind-08 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Review of XCAP -- extensions to HTTP for configuration access (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: WebDAV at IETF 61 (Thursday, 21 October)
• WebDAV server for IETF (Saturday, 16 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: looking for feedback on REDIRECT issue lc-57-noautoupdate (Wednesday, 6 October)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Bindings and permissions (Wednesday, 1 December)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: WebDAV, URL encoding and current Windows clients (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Locks and loopback bindings (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Current status of 2518bis? (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Specification philosophies (Friday, 3 December)

Ted Hardie

• Re: Review of XCAP -- extensions to HTTP for configuration access (Monday, 15 November)

����������

• Re: ответ на запрос (Thursday, 18 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 December 2004 20:15:12 UTC