Re: WebDAV at IETF 61

I'm confused; which day is it you're travelling?  The agenda-meisters 
haven't yet published a final agenda for this IETF, when they do it 
will replace this draft agenda and have WebDAV on it.  
<http://www.ietf.org/meetings/agenda_61.html>

Lisa

On Oct 21, 2004, at 4:53 AM, Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:

> Unfortunately, I also will not be able to attend that meeting
> physically (I'm traveling that day, so will not be able to attend
> remotely either).
>
> So I would also prefer that we have the final discussion on
> BIND in the mailing list, but completely agree with the second
> half of the bullet (i.e., "Let's push this out.").
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
>
> Julian wrote on 10/21/2004 03:25:15 AM:
>>
>> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>>> I've just asked for a slot for us in DC.
>>
>> I will not be able to attend that meeting physically, but I'll try the
>> text conferencing. Generally, for those who need to do travel planning
>> and booking, it would be extremely helpful to know about an upcoming
>> meeting longer in advance.
>>
>>> Does anyone want to propose agenda items?  Here are a couple that I'd
> like
>>> to propose:
>>>
>>> - Final discussion on BIND.  Let's push this out.
>>
>> I'd prefer to do it on the mailing list. Looking back at the previous
>> meetings, none of the active draft contributors attended the meeting
>> physically (except the WG chairs), so no actual progress was made that
> way.
>>
>>> - Redirect: any discussion needed
>>> - 2518bis: status report
>>> - Status of drafts of note for the working group:
>>>  + PATCH
>>>  + Quota
>>>  + Property datatyping
>>>  + SEARCH
>>>  + CalDAV
>>>  + WebDAV-events
>>>
>>> If possible, I'd like for authors of the outstanding documents to
> attend, so
>>> that anything that is discussed can be incorporated into his/her
> thought
>>> process.
>>
>> As far as the drafts that I author are concerned, I'll post a summary 
>> in
>
>> time before the meeting. I'd also like to ask the authors of other
>> drafts to actually follow-up to the feedback that was sent to the
>> mailing list in response to their drafts being published.

Received on Friday, 22 October 2004 21:51:14 UTC