- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:29:48 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: ejw@cs.ucsc.edu, "'WebDAV (WebDAV WG)'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: >> Seems to me the href should hold a fully qualified URL, since other >> hrefs in >> the specification do this as well. > > > It may hold whatever RFC2518 defines for DAV:href (we probably should > let the DTD fragment refer to RFC2518, section 12.3, right?). RFC2518 > relies on RFC2068, section 3.2.1, which allows both absoluteURI and > relativeURI. > ... Do we need to clarify the source of DAV:href's definition somewhere in BIND? Alternatives seem to be: - explicitly mention it in the Terminology section, - add a comment to each DTD fragment using it. I personally feel that we don't need (for instance, RFC3744 doesn't seem to do it either), so unless somebody speaks up, I'll consider this one closed. Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 08:30:30 UTC