RE: Comments on bind-08

• From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cs.ucsc.edu>
• Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:18:10 -0800
• To: "'WebDAV \(WebDAV WG\)'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <200412012018.iB1KIHxs022402@cats-mx3.ucsc.edu>

 
> I think the answer would be: none specific. The status would 
> be just 506. There are many potential error conditions for 
> which BIND doesn't define specific names. As a matter of 
> fact, I'd say it's not possible to enumerate them all.

OK, then I'm fine with letting this issue go.

> OK, just to clarify: you'd like to see an example for lock 
> tokens being submitted in a non-trivial namespace operation 
> such as MOVE/REBIND between locked collections? I'm not 
> strongly opposed to that; I just like to understand the 
> motivation (which in this case would be: we don't have an 
> example like that in RFC2518, so this may be an action item 
> for RFC2518bis as well).

Yes, that's correct. I'm fine with this being added as an action item for
2518bis as well.

- Jim

Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2004 20:20:08 UTC