Re: BIND issue "binding properties", was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-07.txt

> See 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JanMar/0154.html> 

> and 
> 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JanMar/0146.html>.
> 
> In the discussion thread 
> 
(<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JanMar/thread.html#154
> >), 
> I see three people agreeing (Geoff, Jason and myself) and nobody 
> supporting Lisa's point of view, so, as far as I can tell, there was a 
> rough consensus that this isn't a problem at *that* point of time.

Seeing my name here prompted me to think about what my position is.  I 
came
up with it and then checked the thread and I pretty much agree with what I
said in the thread.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JanMar/0164.html

I'd only add, that we can define an extension later that clarifies 
when/how
properties can change by URL.  But I don't think we need that now and I 
think
we're better off not adding it right now.  Until we/someone do/does, 
people 
implementing bind should be trying real hard not to vary properties
by URL.