- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:33:29 +0100
- To: ejw@cs.ucsc.edu
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Jim Whitehead wrote: > I'm reading through the BIND specification, and the description of the > REBIND method's operands is a bit unclear to me. I'm assuming the intent is > similar to BIND and UNBIND, each of which clearly state in the first > sentence what role the Request-URI, segment, and href fields play. In my > reading I just jumped right into the spec. at this method (typical reference > reading pattern), and hence I didn't initially see the similarity with the > BIND and UNBIND method operands. Agreed. Would replacing "The REBIND method removes a binding to a resource from one collection, and adds a binding to that resource into another collection. It is effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request." by "The REBIND method removes a binding to a resource from the collection identified by the Request-URI, and adds a binding to that resource into another collection. It is effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request." be sufficient? Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 14:35:36 UTC